Comments on: About Camera Raw 4.1

By: erickteknik

erickteknik — Thu, 17 May 2012 17:23:51 +0000

Thank you for some other great article. The place else could anyone get that type of information in such a perfect approach of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at the search for such info. CLICKBET88.COM AGEN BOLA TERPERCAYA UNTUK PIALA EURO 2012

By: ichaljhe

ichaljhe — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:35:15 +0000

By: priyarani

priyarani — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:47:48 +0000

I feel really happy and grateful for providing me with such priceless sound track. All are good here simply best. I want such article again and again.Bollywood Songs

By: priyarani

priyarani — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:47:26 +0000

Very fantastic post. I really enjoyed reading it. Thanks for sharing. Keep up the good work. Sadda Adda Songs

By: priyarani

priyarani — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:47:00 +0000

This was a fantastic post. Really loved reading your weblog post. The information was very informative and helpful.Players Movie songs

By: priyarani

priyarani — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:45 +0000

Its so good think. I like much more and like ever one. I think it would be better if you add a snippets about the program.London Paris New York Songs

By: ichaljhe

ichaljhe — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:23:45 +0000

Attractive section of content. I simply stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I acquire in fact loved account your weblog posts. Anyway Ill be subscribing in your augment and even I achievement you access persistently rapidly. Harga Notebook

By: ichaljhe

ichaljhe — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:23:08 +0000

In the grand pattern of things you get a B- with regard to effort. Where exactly you actually misplaced everybody was first on the particulars. As people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more correct right here. Ultrabook Notebook Tipis Harga Murah Terbaik

By: ichaljhe

ichaljhe — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:16:30 +0000

Great beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear idea Adira Asuransi Kendaraan Terbaik Indonesia

By: ichaljhe

ichaljhe — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:12:09 +0000

Thanks for the informative blog. The place else may possibly just I get that kind of info written in such a excellent approach? I’ve a venture that I’m just now operating on, and I’ve been on the glance out for such info. Adira Asuransi Kendaraan Terbaik Indonesia

By: johnbond

johnbond — Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:08:35 +0000

Excellent post. I want to thank you for this informative read, I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work… Buy Stratterra

By: naima88

naima88 — Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:17:27 +0000

This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job, indeed. holiday forum

By: rohitshah

rohitshah — Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:00:13 +0000

There are many person searching about that now they will find enough resources by your post SEO Services India

By: emtyness

emtyness — Sat, 13 Aug 2011 01:47:37 +0000

This is awesome and very useful, I can't thank you enough. EMT Training

By: zawers

zawers — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:06:05 +0000

i think C1 is better!

By: ngutman

ngutman — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:11:40 +0000

Is there a “printer friendly” version of this article?

By: Garland Cary

Garland Cary — Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:08:07 +0000

Count me among the apparently few not impressed at all with the overall changes wrought upon ACR and Lightroom with these latest iterations. It appears that in their zeal to attract the larger marketplace of casual users, Adobe have “fixed” the one thing that wasn’t broken with their previous versions of ACR and Lightroom: the quality of the basic RAW conversion. In place of the previously organic, if slightly noisy, image quality, we now have by default an overtly processed looking conversion. Sure, there’s less visible noise, but fine detail has been obliterated, with delicate structures such as individual strands of hair having lost their dimensionality and now rendered as flat, planar surfaces. Now, I do understand what’s happening and why: it would seem the software is bundling image data into little packets, then averaging the color and luminance data of that package to, effectively, reduce the impact of noise. The downside is that detail takes a noticeable hit, which I suppose is not big deal for most users who will downsample the image for majority of their uses. But for serious users whose work needs to withstand scrutiny at and beyond 100%, the decline in image quality is unacceptable. The worst part is that no “zeroing” of controls can coax from the new version a less-processed result as was previously the standard with ACR/Lightroom. The new versions of ACR and Lightroom may be better single-stop applications for casual users, but for critical usage, it’s a step in the wrong direction as I can fairly easily get superior results from the older versions + Noise Ninja in Photoshop. In fact, I removed LR1.1 from my Mac and re-installed LR1.0, which I’ll continue to use as long as there is support for my current and future DSLRs, but as I’m fairly certain Adobe will not expand DSLR support with this version to include future DSLR models, I’m very likely to return to using a combination of Canon’s own Digital Photo Professional software and Apple’s Aperture for my RAW workflow and conversion since either of these tools now give far superior quality of image than the latest versions of ACR/LR.

I’m very disappointed that Adobe charges a professional price for Lightroom, but cripples it with consumer-level RAW conversion.

By: luca

luca — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:32:09 +0000

I’ve always used in the very beginnig of my workflow the “local contrast enhancement” as Mr.Knoll suggested: amount 20% radius 50 threshold 0.That works fine for me in most images. Now I see that the “Clarity” does the same work,and I’d like to be able to use it instead of my old “local contrast..”: which Clarity settings are equivalent (more or less) to a. 20 r. 50 t. 0?
Thank you

Luca

lcafiero@fastwebnet.it

By: rickbrad

rickbrad — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:25:47 +0000

Jeff,

Do you know why the ability to selectively turn off auto settings was taken out of the converter?

I liked on the older version I had the ability to revert the exposure back to where the image was captured but leave the brightness auto adjusted, etc.

By: glacort

glacort — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:03:48 +0000

Jeff,

having read again this article, looked at the clips 100%, could not wait, run to buy the upgrade, downloaded 4.1, overwhelmed !

Much better than I thought, even a shade better that a certain converter I am in love with …

For most of my raws I will not need any more post process.

Thanks !