<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Selection tool and Refine Edge in CS3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoshopnews.com/2007/04/05/quick-selection-tool-and-refine-edge-in-cs3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2007/04/05/quick-selection-tool-and-refine-edge-in-cs3/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stanr</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2007/04/05/quick-selection-tool-and-refine-edge-in-cs3/#comment-9973</link>
		<dc:creator>stanr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/2007/04/05/quick-selection-tool-and-refine-edge-in-cs3/#comment-9973</guid>
		<description>Very interesting tutorial. The use of Quick Mask to reveal what is/is not selected was a bit confusing at first. I have always used QM to define what IS selected. Apparently you have QM set to show what is NOT selected. You must feel there is some advantage to using QM in this way, and I would find it helpful to know why, and whether you always use QM to define what is not selected or just when using Quick Select.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting tutorial. The use of Quick Mask to reveal what is/is not selected was a bit confusing at first. I have always used QM to define what IS selected. Apparently you have QM set to show what is NOT selected. You must feel there is some advantage to using QM in this way, and I would find it helpful to know why, and whether you always use QM to define what is not selected or just when using Quick Select.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
