Comments on: Katie Couric Before/After http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/29/katie-couric-beforeafter/ The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet. Tue, 28 May 2013 20:20:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Charles http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/29/katie-couric-beforeafter/comment-page-1/#comment-8895 Charles Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:20:22 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/29/katie-couric-beforeafter/#comment-8895 Boy I couldn’t disagree more. This photograph represents the new, CBS provided “Gold Standard” in TV journalism. I realize that might not be a new Edward R. Murrow, but they should know that discovery of a doctored photo erodes any positive perception of how they handle the reporting of news at CBS. Perhaps they effectively Photoshop there reports in a similar manner by purposefully casting a more attractive light on a less attractive story (which I am sure is the case anyway). At any rate, CBS (Corporate or otherwise), should not be offering up altered realities.

In another light, I wonder how Katie feels about this. Basically they called her a fatty, visually.

]]>
By: dc photographer http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/29/katie-couric-beforeafter/comment-page-1/#comment-8894 dc photographer Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:50:28 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/29/katie-couric-beforeafter/#comment-8894 While I don’t see any problems with CBS corporate releasing a retouched photo, since it’s not journalism. In fact, CBS may have re-released a second retouched one, and their sister publication either didn’t know to find the earlier one, or never got it, and went with this one.

IF it were a newspaper or wire service who did the manipulation, then I’d have a big problem with it!

John

]]>