<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reuters withdraws all photos by freelancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kaisersuzuki</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8871</link>
		<dc:creator>kaisersuzuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8871</guid>
		<description>If you are going to be a propaganda monger the least you can do is learn how to mak a decent piece of fiction!!!!  This guy sucks!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to be a propaganda monger the least you can do is learn how to mak a decent piece of fiction!!!!  This guy sucks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hcq</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>hcq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>Read the Reuters statement carefully.  Reuters says it replaced the badly-Photoshopped image with a "corrected" one. They do nbot use the word "original." 

Look carefully at the lower left quadrant of the "corrected" image and you will see it too contains cloned buildings.  See &lt;a href="http://yfs.typepad.com/mileditors/2006/08/stupid_photosho.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to compare those two images with what many believe is the actual, unaltered image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the Reuters statement carefully.  Reuters says it replaced the badly-Photoshopped image with a &#8220;corrected&#8221; one. They do nbot use the word &#8220;original.&#8221; </p>
<p>Look carefully at the lower left quadrant of the &#8220;corrected&#8221; image and you will see it too contains cloned buildings.  See <a href="http://yfs.typepad.com/mileditors/2006/08/stupid_photosho.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> to compare those two images with what many believe is the actual, unaltered image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
