Comments on: Reuters withdraws all photos by freelancer http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/ The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet. Thu, 17 May 2012 17:23:51 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Chicago photographer http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/comment-page-1/#comment-13375 Chicago photographer Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:55:49 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-13375 Let's remember too that this sort of thing goes on in U.S. publications too. From Time's cover of the OJ Simpson mug shot to The L.A. Times photographer's reworking if an Iraq invasion photo, this is going on everywhere. Let’s remember too that this sort of thing goes on in U.S. publications too. From Time’s cover of the OJ Simpson mug shot to The L.A. Times photographer’s reworking if an Iraq invasion photo, this is going on everywhere.

]]> By: kaisersuzuki http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/comment-page-1/#comment-8871 kaisersuzuki Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:33:20 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8871 If you are going to be a propaganda monger the least you can do is learn how to mak a decent piece of fiction!!!! This guy sucks!!! If you are going to be a propaganda monger the least you can do is learn how to mak a decent piece of fiction!!!! This guy sucks!!!

]]> By: hcq http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/comment-page-1/#comment-8870 hcq Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:25:19 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2006/08/07/reuters-withdraws-all-photos-by-freelancer/#comment-8870 Read the Reuters statement carefully. Reuters says it replaced the badly-Photoshopped image with a "corrected" one. They do nbot use the word "original." Look carefully at the lower left quadrant of the "corrected" image and you will see it too contains cloned buildings. See <a href="http://yfs.typepad.com/mileditors/2006/08/stupid_photosho.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> to compare those two images with what many believe is the actual, unaltered image. Read the Reuters statement carefully. Reuters says it replaced the badly-Photoshopped image with a “corrected” one. They do nbot use the word “original.”

Look carefully at the lower left quadrant of the “corrected” image and you will see it too contains cloned buildings. See here to compare those two images with what many believe is the actual, unaltered image.

]]>