<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RG Forums have changed to Pro Photo Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>eu qro tirar fotu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eu qro tirar fotu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal Sessa</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal Sessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>With all due respect to RG, he should have "quit while he was ahead," rather than have his good name mixed in with this (apropriately dubbed by AR) "mess."

Ah well....

SAS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all due respect to RG, he should have &#8220;quit while he was ahead,&#8221; rather than have his good name mixed in with this (apropriately dubbed by AR) &#8220;mess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah well&#8230;.</p>
<p>SAS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rodney</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>Banned members back? Don't think so. At least its not across the boards. I can't even get Drew to remove my 2500+ posts even after two emails requesting removal. Can't do it myself; I'm locked out (banned and NOT invited back). 

The posts on Luminous Landscape sum this mess all up. Better to go there since the RG refugees seem to be hanging there and Michael is very hands off when it comes to moderation unlike the older RG site. 

Without a good community of posters, what's the point of dropping $25 on this new site? I smell failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banned members back? Don&#8217;t think so. At least its not across the boards. I can&#8217;t even get Drew to remove my 2500+ posts even after two emails requesting removal. Can&#8217;t do it myself; I&#8217;m locked out (banned and NOT invited back). </p>
<p>The posts on Luminous Landscape sum this mess all up. Better to go there since the RG refugees seem to be hanging there and Michael is very hands off when it comes to moderation unlike the older RG site. </p>
<p>Without a good community of posters, what&#8217;s the point of dropping $25 on this new site? I smell failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
