Comments on: RG Forums have changed to Pro Photo Community http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/ The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet. Sat, 25 May 2013 08:41:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: pedro http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-8308 pedro Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:58:39 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-8308 eu qro tirar fotu

]]>
By: Sal Sessa http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-2601 Sal Sessa Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:48:26 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-2601 With all due respect to RG, he should have “quit while he was ahead,” rather than have his good name mixed in with this (apropriately dubbed by AR) “mess.”

Ah well….

SAS

]]>
By: Andrew Rodney http://photoshopnews.com/2006/04/28/rg-forums-have-changed-to-pro-photo-community/comment-page-1/#comment-2594 Andrew Rodney Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:29:24 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/?p=1147#comment-2594 Banned members back? Don’t think so. At least its not across the boards. I can’t even get Drew to remove my 2500+ posts even after two emails requesting removal. Can’t do it myself; I’m locked out (banned and NOT invited back).

The posts on Luminous Landscape sum this mess all up. Better to go there since the RG refugees seem to be hanging there and Michael is very hands off when it comes to moderation unlike the older RG site.

Without a good community of posters, what’s the point of dropping $25 on this new site? I smell failure.

]]>