<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding ProPhoto RGB - UPDATE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/</link>
	<description>The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Kitsov</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Kitsov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=452#comment-649</guid>
		<description>I have posted an analysis of a practical side of the issue on my blog:
http://dimak.blogspot.com/2005/07/practical-side-to-adobergb-versus.html
sorry for the shameless self promotion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have posted an analysis of a practical side of the issue on my blog:<br />
<a href="http://dimak.blogspot.com/2005/07/practical-side-to-adobergb-versus.html" rel="nofollow">http://dimak.blogspot.com/2005/07/practical-side-to-adobergb-versus.html</a><br />
sorry for the shameless self promotion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=452#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rodney.Just one of things that make you go hmmmmmm...
with apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rodney.Just one of things that make you go hmmmmmm&#8230;<br />
with apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rodney</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=452#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Looking at 3D gamut maps of both custom profiles I built for the R800 and 2400 (gloss papers) indeed there are areas that fall outside Adobe RGB (1998). More on the 2400 than R800 but certainly a noticeable amount in yellows and some greens. 

The RGB defaults in ColorSync (which have been pulled from Tiger) are kind of flakey. You’re lead to believe this is used as a default for untagged docs (that’s what it says) but this doesn’t seem to be the case. Depending on what application you’re using, especially Apple Apps, this “default” is ignored and sRGB or your display profile (or Generic RGB) is being used. I’m frankly confused what Apple is trying to accomplish here in Panther but moving onto Tiger, this preference is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at 3D gamut maps of both custom profiles I built for the R800 and 2400 (gloss papers) indeed there are areas that fall outside Adobe RGB (1998). More on the 2400 than R800 but certainly a noticeable amount in yellows and some greens. </p>
<p>The RGB defaults in ColorSync (which have been pulled from Tiger) are kind of flakey. You’re lead to believe this is used as a default for untagged docs (that’s what it says) but this doesn’t seem to be the case. Depending on what application you’re using, especially Apple Apps, this “default” is ignored and sRGB or your display profile (or Generic RGB) is being used. I’m frankly confused what Apple is trying to accomplish here in Panther but moving onto Tiger, this preference is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://photoshopnews.com/2005/06/09/understanding-prophoto-rgb-update/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photoshopnews.com/?p=452#comment-575</guid>
		<description>I've noticed that even on a calibrated system with ColorSync
prefs set to ProPhoto as RGB default in OS X that all system displays like file thumbnails and even the print with preview dialogue box, show Profoto files as distinctly greenish. Output is fine. Anybody know why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that even on a calibrated system with ColorSync<br />
prefs set to ProPhoto as RGB default in OS X that all system displays like file thumbnails and even the print with preview dialogue box, show Profoto files as distinctly greenish. Output is fine. Anybody know why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
