Comments on: “Star” Fakes It for Brad, Angelina http://photoshopnews.com/2005/04/29/star-fakes-it-for-brad-angelina/ The latest news about the top pixel wrangling application on the planet. Tue, 21 May 2013 09:59:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: asdf http://photoshopnews.com/2005/04/29/star-fakes-it-for-brad-angelina/comment-page-1/#comment-470 asdf Tue, 17 May 2005 20:18:49 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2005/04/29/star-fakes-it-for-brad-angelina/#comment-470 yo yo yo mafizzle

]]>
By: JohnHHarrington http://photoshopnews.com/2005/04/29/star-fakes-it-for-brad-angelina/comment-page-1/#comment-432 JohnHHarrington Mon, 02 May 2005 06:23:18 +0000 http://photoshopnews.com/2005/04/29/star-fakes-it-for-brad-angelina/#comment-432 After seeing this and looking to obtain a copy of the magazine for a future project on ethics, I looked inside to the place where a photo credit would appear, and, without photo credits of the actual photographers, it states that the images is a composite of two photographs, fyi. I agree that it’s a total breach of ethics, and could/should get sued by Pitt/Jolie over this, but since almost no magazines run photo credits on covers, and almost all “photo illustrations” are not noted as such on the cover — whether obvious or not, what I think is quite interesting is the seeming graduation of Star/Enquirer/etc from the past expectation of altered photos (Clinton Meets With Aliens/Elvis Today/JFK Today/etc) to the expectation that they’re to be expected to run unaltered photos.

John

]]>